VAZ 2107 1982 vs Mazda Xedos 6 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Mazda Xedos 6 is a more dynamic driving. VAZ 2107 engine produces 72 HP less power than Mazda Xedos 6, whereas torque is 59 NM less than Mazda Xedos 6. Due to the lower power, VAZ 2107 reaches 100 km/h speed 6.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 9.1 | |
| VAZ 2107 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Xedos 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the VAZ 2107 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 39 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 420 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 570 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Mazda Xedos 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda Xedos 6) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (VAZ 2107) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.15 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.62 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.36 m | |
|
VAZ 2107 is smaller, but higher. VAZ 2107 is 42 cm shorter than the Mazda Xedos 6, 8 cm narrower, while the height of VAZ 2107 is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 325 litres | 390 litres | |
|
Mazda Xedos 6 has more luggage space. VAZ 2107 has 65 litres less trunk space than the Mazda Xedos 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`430 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda Xedos 6 has
| |