VAZ 2106 1982 vs Volvo S70 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 92 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo S70 is a more dynamic driving. VAZ 2106 engine produces 76 HP less power than Volvo S70, whereas torque is 198 NM less than Volvo S70. Due to the lower power, VAZ 2106 reaches 100 km/h speed 9.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 6.6 | |
|
The Volvo S70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. VAZ 2106 consumes 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S70, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the VAZ 2106 could require 585 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 39 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 370 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 500 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S70 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo S70) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (VAZ 2106) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.61 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.39 m | |
|
VAZ 2106 is smaller, but higher. VAZ 2106 is 55 cm shorter than the Volvo S70, 15 cm narrower, while the height of VAZ 2106 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 345 litres | 470 litres | |
|
Volvo S70 has more luggage space. VAZ 2106 has 125 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S70. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`435 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo S70 has
| |