Toyota iQ 2009 vs Hyundai i10 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 69 HP | |
| Torque: | 91 NM | 99 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
| Toyota iQ engine produces 1 HP less power than Hyundai i10, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Hyundai i10. Despite less power, Toyota iQ reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota iQ is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota iQ consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i10, which means that by driving the Toyota iQ over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota iQ consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai i10. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 32 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai i10 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Toyota Aygo, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota iQ might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 2.99 m | 3.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.54 m | |
| Toyota iQ is 60 cm shorter than the Hyundai i10, 9 cm wider, while the height of Toyota iQ is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 32 litres | 225 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 910 litres | |
|
Hyundai i10 has more luggage space. Toyota iQ has 193 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai i10. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 7.8 meters | 9.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota iQ is 1.7 metres less than that of the Hyundai i10, which means Toyota iQ can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`405 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Toyota iQ has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai i10 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Toyota iQ, so Toyota iQ quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota iQ has
|
Hyundai i10 has
| |