Toyota Yaris 1999 vs Renault Clio 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 90 NM | 105 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Yaris engine produces 7 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Toyota Yaris reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Yaris is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota Yaris consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Toyota Yaris over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Yaris consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Citroen C1, Toyota Aygo, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo, Dacia Sandero | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Yaris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.61 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.42 m | |
| Toyota Yaris is 20 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 2 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Yaris is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 510 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Yaris is 0.5 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Toyota Yaris can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 650 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Toyota Yaris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Toyota Yaris, so Toyota Yaris quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Yaris has
|
Renault Clio has
| |