Toyota Verso 2013 vs Volkswagen Touran 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 126 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Verso engine produces 14 HP less power than Volkswagen Touran, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Volkswagen Touran. Due to the lower power, Toyota Verso reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Verso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Verso consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that by driving the Toyota Verso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Verso consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Corolla Verso | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.67 m | |
| Toyota Verso is 6 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touran, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Verso is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 484 litres | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1740 litres | 1989 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Verso has 211 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Touran. This could mean that the Toyota Verso uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 249 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Verso is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Touran, which means Toyota Verso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`260 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Toyota Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Touran has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Toyota Verso, so Toyota Verso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Verso has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |