Toyota Verso 2013 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 126 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota Verso is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Verso engine produces 14 HP more power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Citroen C4 Picasso. Thanks to more power Toyota Verso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Verso consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Verso could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Verso consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1370 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen C4 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Corolla Verso | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Citroen C5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Verso is 2 cm longer than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Verso is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 484 litres | 537 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1740 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Verso has 53 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. This could mean that the Toyota Verso uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Verso is 0.8 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means Toyota Verso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`260 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Toyota Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Picasso has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Toyota Verso, so Toyota Verso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Verso has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |