Toyota Verso 2010 vs Citroen C3 Picasso 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 89 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
| Toyota Verso engine produces 21 HP less power than Citroen C3 Picasso, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Citroen C3 Picasso. Despite less power, Toyota Verso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 4.8 | |
|
The Toyota Verso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Verso consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C3 Picasso, which means that by driving the Toyota Verso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C3 Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | 4.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Toyota Verso is smaller. Toyota Verso is 9 cm shorter than the Citroen C3 Picasso, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Verso is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 385 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
623 litres | 1506 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Toyota Verso has 45 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C3 Picasso. The Citroen C3 Picasso may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C3 Picasso (by 883 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Verso is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen C3 Picasso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`807 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Toyota Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C3 Picasso has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Toyota Verso, so Toyota Verso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Verso has
|
Citroen C3 Picasso has
| |