Toyota Tundra 2008 vs Nissan Navara 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 386 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 544 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota Tundra is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Tundra engine produces 155 HP more power than Nissan Navara, but torque is 6 NM less than Nissan Navara. Thanks to more power Toyota Tundra reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.3 | 9.5 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Tundra consumes 5.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Tundra could require 870 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.81 m | 5.40 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Toyota Tundra is larger. Toyota Tundra is 41 cm longer than the Nissan Navara, 18 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Tundra is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | 13.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Tundra is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Navara. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`221 | 3`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 400 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Tundra has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |