Toyota Tundra 2008 vs Ford Ranger 2012
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 386 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 544 NM | 375 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
Toyota Tundra is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Tundra engine produces 236 HP more power than Ford Ranger, whereas torque is 169 NM more than Ford Ranger. Thanks to more power Toyota Tundra reaches 100 km/h speed 6.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.3 | 8.5 | |
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Tundra consumes 6.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Tundra could require 1020 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
720 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.81 m | 5.36 m | |
Width: | 2.03 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.94 m | 1.82 m | |
Toyota Tundra is larger. Toyota Tundra is 45 cm longer than the Ford Ranger, 18 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Tundra is 12 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 1210 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | 12.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Tundra is 0.7 metres more than that of the Ford Ranger, which means Toyota Tundra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`221 | 1`144 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 21 400 | 20 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Tundra has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |