Toyota Tundra 2013 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 4.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 381 HP | 339 HP | |
Torque: | 543 NM | 700 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
Toyota Tundra engine produces 42 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover, but torque is 157 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.7 | 8.7 | |
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Tundra consumes 7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Tundra could require 1050 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 120 litres | 105 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
860 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.81 m | 5.00 m | |
Width: | 2.03 m | 2.07 m | |
Height: | 1.93 m | 1.84 m | |
Toyota Tundra is 82 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Tundra is 10 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 550 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2030 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 12.3 meters | |
Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 3`200 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 37 600 | 51 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Tundra has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |