Toyota Tundra 2013 vs Ford F150 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 4.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 381 HP | 385 HP | |
| Torque: | 543 NM | 525 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Tundra engine produces 4 HP less power than Ford F150, but torque is 18 NM more than Ford F150. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.7 | 13.8 | |
|
The Ford F150 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Tundra consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford F150, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Tundra could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 120 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Tundra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.81 m | 5.89 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.93 m | 1.92 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Tundra is 8 cm shorter than the Ford F150, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Tundra is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2200 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 14.9 meters | no data | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`175 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 39 200 | 28 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Tundra has
|
Ford F150 has
| |