Toyota Tundra 2013 vs Audi Q7 2009

 
Toyota Tundra
2013 - 2017
Audi Q7
2009 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 5.7 Petrol3.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 381 HP240 HP
Torque: 543 NM550 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds8.5 seconds
Toyota Tundra engine produces 141 HP more power than Audi Q7, but torque is 7 NM less than Audi Q7.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 15.79.1
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Toyota Tundra consumes 6.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Tundra could require 990 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 120 litres100 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle1090 km in combined cycle
910 km on highway1280 km on highway
Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 254 mm (10 inches)205 mm (8.1 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Tundra can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Toyota Tundra version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from four 4x4 versions of Toyota Tundra 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you.

Dimensions

Length: 5.81 m5.09 m
Width: 2.03 m1.98 m
Height: 1.93 m1.74 m
Toyota Tundra is larger.
Toyota Tundra is 73 cm longer than the Audi Q7, 5 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Tundra is 19 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data775 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2035 litres
Turning diameter: 14.9 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota Tundra is 2.9 metres more than that of the Audi Q7, which means Toyota Tundra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): 3`1753`200
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 37 40017 200
Pros and Cons: Toyota Tundra has
  • more power
  • higher ground clearance
  • hydraulic power steering
Audi Q7 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • has 4x4 drive
  • better manoeuvrability
  • electric power steering
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv