Toyota Tundra 2009 vs Ford F150 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 236 HP | 302 HP | |
| Torque: | 361 NM | 377 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Tundra engine produces 66 HP less power than Ford F150, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Ford F150. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.5 | 12.4 | |
|
The Ford F150 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Tundra consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford F150, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Tundra could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 98 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Ford F150 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.81 m | 5.89 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.91 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Tundra is 8 cm shorter than the Ford F150, 2 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Tundra is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.6 meters | 14.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Tundra is 0.7 metres less than that of the Ford F150, which means Toyota Tundra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`903 | 3`084 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 400 | 19 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Tundra has
|
Ford F150 has
| |