Toyota Tundra 2010 vs Ford F150 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 4.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 310 HP | 248 HP | |
| Torque: | 460 NM | 294 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Tundra engine produces 62 HP more power than Ford F150, whereas torque is 166 NM more than Ford F150. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.1 | 14.0 | |
|
The Toyota Tundra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Tundra consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford F150, which means that by driving the Toyota Tundra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 100 litres | 98 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Tundra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.81 m | 5.89 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.89 m | |
| Toyota Tundra is 8 cm shorter than the Ford F150, 3 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Tundra is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1572 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1855 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.4 meters | no data | |
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`039 | 3`084 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 400 | 19 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Tundra has
|
Ford F150 has
| |