Toyota Tundra 2008 vs Toyota 4-Runner 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 4.0 - 5.7 | 4.0 - 4.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 236 - 386 HP | 235 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 361 - 544 NM | 382 - 434 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | 7.8 - 8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.1 - 15.3 | 12.2 - 14.1 | |
|
Toyota Tundra petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota 4-Runner. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 259 - 264 mm (10.2 - 10.4 inches) | 226 - 231 mm (8.9 - 9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Tundra can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.81 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Toyota Tundra is larger. Toyota Tundra is 101 cm longer than the Toyota 4-Runner, 16 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Tundra is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1195 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2050 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Tundra is 2.5 metres more than that of the Toyota 4-Runner, which means Toyota Tundra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`085 | ~ 2`411 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Tundra has
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |