Toyota Tundra 2013 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toyota Tundra is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mitsubishi L 200 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 4.0 - 5.7 | 2.3 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 270 - 381 HP | 150 - 181 HP | |
| Torque: | 377 - 543 NM | 380 - 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.8 - 15.7 | 7.6 - 8.6 | |
| Ground clearance: | 254 - 269 mm (10 - 10.6 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Tundra can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.81 m | 5.27 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.93 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Toyota Tundra is larger. Toyota Tundra is 54 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 21 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Tundra is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1061 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 14.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Tundra is 3.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi L 200, which means Toyota Tundra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`115 | ~ 2`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 37 400 | 32 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Tundra has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |