Toyota Tundra 2013 vs Ford F150 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 4.0 - 5.7 | 2.7 - 4.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 270 - 381 HP | 282 - 385 HP | |
| Torque: | 377 - 543 NM | 343 - 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.8 - 15.7 | 10.7 - 13.8 | |
|
Toyota Tundra petrol engines consumes on average 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford F150. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.81 m | 5.89 m | |
| Width: | 2.03 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.93 m | 1.92 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Tundra is 8 cm shorter than the Ford F150, width is practically the same , while the height of Toyota Tundra is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2200 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 14.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`115 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 37 400 | 26 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford F150 has
| |