Toyota Sienna 2010 vs Chrysler Pacifica 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 266 HP | 291 HP | |
| Torque: | 392 NM | 355 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Sienna engine produces 25 HP less power than Chrysler Pacifica, but torque is 37 NM more than Chrysler Pacifica. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.1 | 10.7 | |
|
The Chrysler Pacifica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Sienna consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Pacifica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Sienna could require 360 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Pacifica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 168 mm (6.6 inches) | 131 mm (5.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota Sienna can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Toyota Sienna version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Lexus RX, Toyota Camry, Lexus ES | Used also on Jeep Wrangler | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Sienna might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 5.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.99 m | 2.02 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Toyota Sienna is smaller. Toyota Sienna is 9 cm shorter than the Chrysler Pacifica, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Sienna is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 993 litres | 915 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
3810 litres | 3979 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Toyota Sienna has 78 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Pacifica. The Chrysler Pacifica may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Pacifica (by 169 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Sienna is 0.7 metres less than that of the Chrysler Pacifica, which means Toyota Sienna can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`724 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 000 | 33 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Sienna has
|
Chrysler Pacifica has
| |