Toyota Picnic 1997 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 14.7 seconds | |
| Toyota Picnic engine produces 25 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 105 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Despite less power, Toyota Picnic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 11.2 | |
|
The Toyota Picnic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Picnic consumes 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Toyota Picnic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 525 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Picnic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Toyota Picnic is smaller. Toyota Picnic is 10 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Picnic is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Picnic is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Toyota Picnic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 320 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 6.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Picnic has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |