Toyota Picnic 1997 vs Toyota Camry 2001
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 218 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota Camry is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Picnic engine produces 62 HP less power than Toyota Camry, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Toyota Camry. Due to the lower power, Toyota Picnic reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Picnic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Picnic consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Camry, which means that by driving the Toyota Picnic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Picnic consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Camry. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Camry gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Toyota Picnic is smaller, but higher. Toyota Picnic is 29 cm shorter than the Toyota Camry, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Picnic is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Picnic has
|
Toyota Camry has
| |