Toyota Picnic 1997 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Picnic engine produces 46 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, but torque is 27 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Due to the lower power, Toyota Picnic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 9.2 | |
|
The Toyota Picnic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Picnic consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that by driving the Toyota Picnic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Picnic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Toyota Picnic is smaller. Toyota Picnic is 7 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Picnic is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 6 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | 240 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 180 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | 1930 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Wagon (by 90 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Space Wagon has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Picnic has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |