Toyota Picnic 1997 vs Mercedes Vito 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 20.6 seconds | |
| Toyota Picnic engine produces 8 HP less power than Mercedes Vito, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Mercedes Vito. Despite less power, Toyota Picnic reaches 100 km/h speed 6.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.8 | |
|
The Toyota Picnic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Picnic consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes Vito, which means that by driving the Toyota Picnic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes Vito gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Toyota Picnic is smaller. Toyota Picnic is 13 cm shorter than the Mercedes Vito, 18 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Picnic is 22 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Picnic is 1.4 metres less than that of the Mercedes Vito, which means Toyota Picnic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Picnic has
|
Mercedes Vito has
| |