Toyota Picnic 1997 vs Seat Alhambra 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Seat Alhambra is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Picnic engine produces 25 HP less power than Seat Alhambra, whereas torque is 105 NM less than Seat Alhambra. Due to the lower power, Toyota Picnic reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Picnic consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Picnic could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Picnic consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km with real consumption | 970 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Toyota Picnic is smaller. Toyota Picnic is 10 cm shorter than the Seat Alhambra, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Picnic is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | 256 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Alhambra has more luggage space. Toyota Picnic has 76 litres less trunk space than the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Picnic is 0.9 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra, which means Toyota Picnic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Alhambra has serious deffects in 365 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Picnic has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |