Toyota Picnic 1996 vs Volkswagen Sharan 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 15.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota Picnic is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Picnic engine produces 12 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Thanks to more power Toyota Picnic reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Picnic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Picnic consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Toyota Picnic over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Picnic consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Toyota Picnic is smaller. Toyota Picnic is 9 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Picnic is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Picnic is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Toyota Picnic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | low | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 320 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Picnic has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |