Toyota Picnic 1996 vs Toyota Camry 2001
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 218 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota Camry is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Picnic engine produces 24 HP less power than Toyota Camry, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Toyota Camry. Due to the lower power, Toyota Picnic reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Camry is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Picnic consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Camry, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Picnic could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Picnic consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Camry. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Camry gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Carina E, Toyota Hiace | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota RAV4, Toyota Previa | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Picnic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Toyota Picnic is smaller, but higher. Toyota Picnic is 29 cm shorter than the Toyota Camry, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Picnic is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`010 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Picnic has
|
Toyota Camry has
| |