Toyota Picnic 1996 vs Toyota Camry 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.2 (petrol, diesel) | 2.4 - 3.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 128 HP | 152 - 186 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 - 205 NM | 218 - 273 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 - 13.9 seconds | 9.1 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 9.5 | 8.6 - 11.0 | |
|
Toyota Picnic petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Camry. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Toyota Picnic is smaller, but higher. Toyota Picnic is 29 cm shorter than the Toyota Camry, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Picnic is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`007 | ~ 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Picnic has
|
Toyota Camry has
| |