Toyota Picnic 1996 vs Opel Zafira 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.2 | 1.6 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 128 HP | 82 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 - 205 NM | 150 - 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 - 13.9 seconds | 8.2 - 17 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 9.5 | 6.6 - 10.1 | |
|
Toyota Picnic petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Zafira. On average, Toyota Picnic equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Zafira. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.62 m | 1.63 m | |
| Toyota Picnic is 21 cm longer than the Opel Zafira, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Picnic is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | 145 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1840 litres | 1705 litres | |
|
Toyota Picnic has more luggage capacity. Toyota Picnic has 35 litres more trunk space than the Opel Zafira. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Picnic (by 135 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Picnic is 0.9 metres less than that of the Opel Zafira, which means Toyota Picnic can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`007 | ~ 2`035 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.8/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Picnic has
|
Opel Zafira has
| |