Toyota Land Cruiser 1990 vs Jeep Cherokee 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 91 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 188 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 25 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 112 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 76 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 2.07 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 75 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 8 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 44 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 652 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1315 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 1.1 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`230 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |