Toyota Land Cruiser 1990 vs Toyota 4-Runner 1991
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 91 HP | 125 HP | |
Torque: | 188 NM | 295 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 16 seconds | |
Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 34 HP less power than Toyota 4-Runner, whereas torque is 107 NM less than Toyota 4-Runner. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 11.5 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 95 litres | 65 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Part time 4WD | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 480'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 27 years | 3 years | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.00 m | 4.49 m | |
Width: | 1.87 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 2.07 m | 1.75 m | |
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 51 cm longer than the Toyota 4-Runner, 18 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 32 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 1200 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2100 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota 4-Runner, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`510 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 12 600 | 1800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |