Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 vs Toyota 4-Runner 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 434 NM | 434 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 8 seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 3 HP more power than Toyota 4-Runner, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite the higher power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.4 | 14.1 | |
|
The Toyota 4-Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota 4-Runner, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 96 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota 4-Runner gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Part time 4WD | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 9 cm longer than the Toyota 4-Runner, 7 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1195 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2050 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota 4-Runner, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |