Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 vs Volvo XC90 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Diesel | 3.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 243 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 39 HP less power than Volvo XC90, but torque is 110 NM more than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.6 | 11.5 | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 96 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 500'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Volvo XC90 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 8 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 3 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1837 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 9000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.6/10 | 8.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |