Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 441 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 14 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, but torque is 11 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite the higher power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.6 | 9.3 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 495 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 96 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 25 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Pajero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.87 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 1 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 7 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1790 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |