Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.2 Diesel | 3.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 272 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 NM | 640 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 68 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 210 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 96 litres | 100 litres | |
| 690 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Land Rover Range Rover engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Toyota Land Cruiser is 6 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 535 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.2 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |