Toyota Land Cruiser 2007 vs Jeep Commander 2006

 
Toyota Land Cruiser
2007 - 2012
Jeep Commander
2006 - 2010
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 4.5 Diesel4.7 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 235 HP303 HP
Torque: 615 NM445 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.6 seconds9 seconds
Toyota Land Cruiser is more dynamic to drive.
Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 68 HP less power than Jeep Commander, but torque is 170 NM more than Jeep Commander. Despite less power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.013.9
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 3.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Commander, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 585 litres of fuel.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Engine production duration: 17 years5 years
Engine spread: Used also on Lexus LXUsed only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Jeep Commander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.95 m4.79 m
Width: 1.97 m1.90 m
Height: 1.95 m1.92 m
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger.
Toyota Land Cruiser is 16 cm longer than the Jeep Commander, 7 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 701 litresno data
Turning diameter: 12 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Commander.
Gross weight (kg): 3`3002`900
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 21 0009000
Pros and Cons: Toyota Land Cruiser has
  • lower fuel consumption
Jeep Commander has
  • more power
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv