Toyota Land Cruiser 2012 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.6 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 318 HP | 178 HP | |
| Torque: | 460 NM | 261 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 140 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 199 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.3 | 12.2 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 32 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Lexus GS, Lexus GX, Toyota Tundra | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger, but slightly lower. Toyota Land Cruiser is 5 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 10 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 259 litres | 663 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Land Cruiser has 404 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. This could mean that the Toyota Land Cruiser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`350 | 2`810 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 800 | 19 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |