Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 152 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 17.8 seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 52 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 10.6 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 360 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 30 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Mitsubishi L 200 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Pajero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 47 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 740 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`680 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |