Toyota Land Cruiser 2013 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 381 HP | 364 HP | |
| Torque: | 544 NM | 529 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 17 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.0 | 14.7 | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 93 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 226 mm (8.9 inches) | 218 mm (8.6 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 840'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Dodge RAM, Dodge Durango, Dodge Charger | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.95 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 13 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 3 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 456 litres | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2313 litres | 1554 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Toyota Land Cruiser has 326 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Toyota Land Cruiser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Land Cruiser (by 759 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.5 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 3`084 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 800 | 26 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |