Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.4 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 178 HP | 202 HP | |
| Torque: | 303 NM | 318 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 24 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.5 | 13.2 | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 530 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 45 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1150 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`710 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |