Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.4 Petrol | 3.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 178 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 303 NM | 384 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 14 seconds | |
Toyota Land Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 38 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 81 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.5 | 11.8 | |
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 78 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
810 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.73 m | 4.61 m | |
Width: | 1.73 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.86 m | 1.76 m | |
Toyota Land Cruiser is 12 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 10 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1150 litres | 1104 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 2047 litres | |
Toyota Land Cruiser has 46 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 897 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`710 | 2`375 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 7000 | 3400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |