Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 295 NM | 292 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 17.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Land Cruiser and Mitsubishi Pajero have the same engine power, but Toyota Land Cruiser torque is 3 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 12.4 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 92 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Toyota Land Cruiser is 3 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 3 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 742 litres | 1080 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 2050 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Land Cruiser has 338 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. This could mean that the Toyota Land Cruiser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 900 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`680 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |