Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 vs Nissan Patrol 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 295 NM | 323 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 15.4 seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 33 HP less power than Nissan Patrol, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Nissan Patrol. Despite less power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 10.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 12.5 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Patrol, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Patrol. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Nissan Terrano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Patrol might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 5.01 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller. Toyota Land Cruiser is 28 cm shorter than the Nissan Patrol, 20 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 742 litres | 607 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 607 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 742 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 1998 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Patrol (by 848 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.8 metres less than that of the Nissan Patrol, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`680 | 3`080 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Nissan Patrol has
| |