Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 vs Land Rover Discovery 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 113 HP | |
| Torque: | 295 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 18.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is more dynamic to drive. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 12 HP more power than Land Rover Discovery, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Land Rover Discovery. Thanks to more power Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 8.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Discovery is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 89 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Discovery gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Land Rover Range Rover, Land Rover Defender | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Discovery might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.91 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 25 cm longer than the Land Rover Discovery, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 742 litres | 1290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 1970 litres | |
|
Land Rover Discovery has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Land Cruiser has 548 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Discovery. This could mean that the Toyota Land Cruiser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Discovery (by 820 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.6 metres less than that of the Land Rover Discovery, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`680 | 2`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Land Rover Discovery has
| |