Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 vs Land Rover Discovery 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 295 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 15.3 seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 12 HP less power than Land Rover Discovery, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Land Rover Discovery. Despite less power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Discovery is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Discovery gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Land Rover Defender | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.94 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 3 cm longer than the Land Rover Discovery, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 742 litres | 1290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 1970 litres | |
|
Land Rover Discovery has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Toyota Land Cruiser has 548 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Discovery. This could mean that the Toyota Land Cruiser uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Discovery (by 820 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.5 metres less than that of the Land Rover Discovery, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`680 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Land Rover Discovery has
| |