Toyota Land Cruiser 2009 vs Mercedes ML 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 173 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Toyota Land Cruiser engine produces 17 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.8 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that by driving the Toyota Land Cruiser over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Toyota Hilux | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes R klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mercedes ML engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but higher. Toyota Land Cruiser is 2 cm shorter than the Mercedes ML, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 104 litres | 551 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1930 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes ML has more luggage space. Toyota Land Cruiser has 447 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`990 | 2`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 20 800 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |