Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 vs Volvo XC90 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 343 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser and Volvo XC90 have the same engine power, but Toyota Land Cruiser torque is 3 NM more than Volvo XC90. Toyota Land Cruiser reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Toyota Land Cruiser could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Toyota Land Cruiser consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.74 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 5 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2404 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 1.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`735 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 4200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.4/10 | 9.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |