Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 4.2 - 4.7 | 3.2 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 - 238 HP | 165 - 202 HP | |
| Torque: | 430 - 434 NM | 318 - 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 - 13.6 seconds | 10 - 13.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 - 16.4 | 9.1 - 13.8 | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.94 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger. Toyota Land Cruiser is 17 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 4 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1700 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`500 | ~ 2`670 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |