Toyota Land Cruiser 1996 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Toyota Land Cruiser is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Grand Cherokee can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Grand Cherokee also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
Engines: | 2.7 - 3.4 | 2.7 - 4.7 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 125 - 178 HP | 140 - 258 HP | |
Torque: | 240 - 343 NM | 295 - 425 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 14.9 seconds | 8.3 - 14 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 14.1 | 9.7 - 16.5 | |
Toyota Land Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.61 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.86 m | 1.79 m | |
Toyota Land Cruiser is 3 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 1150 litres | 1104 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 2047 litres | |
Toyota Land Cruiser has 46 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 897 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.5 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`663 | ~ 2`447 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 7000 | 3400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |