Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 - 4.0 | 3.2 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 249 HP | 165 - 202 HP | |
| Torque: | 343 - 410 NM | 318 - 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 12.8 seconds | 10 - 13.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 13.6 | 9.1 - 13.8 | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.86 m | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser is 13 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 620 litres | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1700 litres | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage capacity. Toyota Land Cruiser has 205 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`800 | ~ 2`670 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |