Toyota Land Cruiser 2002 vs Nissan Patrol 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 - 4.0 | 3.0 - 4.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 249 HP | 160 - 251 HP | |
| Torque: | 343 - 410 NM | 331 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 - 12.8 seconds | 15.2 - 16.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 13.6 | 10.8 - 14.3 | |
|
On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Patrol. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is smaller, but slightly higher. Toyota Land Cruiser is 22 cm shorter than the Nissan Patrol, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 620 litres | 810 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2226 litres | |
|
Nissan Patrol has more luggage space. Toyota Land Cruiser has 190 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Patrol. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.8 metres less than that of the Nissan Patrol, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`800 | ~ 3`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Toyota Land Cruiser has
|
Nissan Patrol has
| |