Toyota Land Cruiser 2007 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Toyota Land Cruiser
2007 - 2012
Mitsubishi Pajero
2006 - 2011
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 4.0 - 5.73.0 - 3.8

Performance

Power: 235 - 381 HP165 - 250 HP
Torque: 376 - 615 NM261 - 441 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.6 - 9.2 seconds10.2 - 14 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.0 - 15.68.7 - 13.5
Toyota Land Cruiser petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero. On average, Toyota Land Cruiser equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.95 m4.90 m
Width: 1.97 m1.88 m
Height: 1.95 m1.87 m
Toyota Land Cruiser is larger.
Toyota Land Cruiser is 5 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 9 cm wider, while the height of Toyota Land Cruiser is 8 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 701 litres215 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1790 litres
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage capacity.
Toyota Land Cruiser has 486 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero.
Turning diameter: 12 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Toyota Land Cruiser is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Toyota Land Cruiser can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 3`300~ 3`024
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 21 20011 800
Pros and Cons: Toyota Land Cruiser has
  • roomier boot
Mitsubishi Pajero has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv